• Home
  • About Us
    • Clinical Partners
  • Clinical Solutions
    • Technology
    • Upper Extremity Rehabilitation
      • InMotion ARM™
      • InMotion WRIST™
      • InMotion HAND™
    • Patient Evaluation
    • Clinical Research Use Only
      • Lower Extremity: InMotion ANKLE™
      • InMotion Exoskeletal Robot
  • Clinical Research
    • Stroke — Upper Extremity
    • Stroke — Lower Extremity
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • Spinal Cord Injury
    • Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Published Research
  • Clinicians
    • Objective Outcome Measures
    • Clinical Guidelines — AHA
    • Clinical Guidelines — VA
      • Cost Analysis — Veteran Affairs
    • InMotion WRIST™ Therapy
    • 2D vs 3D Therapy
  • Patients
    • Testimonials
  • Press
    • News
    • Events
    • InMotion on TV
  • Contact Us

    Cost Analysis—Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

    Home » Clinicians » Clinical Guidelines — Veterans Affairs » Cost Analysis—Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

    Cost Analysis of InMotion Robotic Therapy Utilized in the
    Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

     

    GREATER BENEFIT

    LOWER COST.


    COST TO THE VA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM

    Average per patient additional cost of therapy


    Robot Therapy: US $5,152
    ICT: US $7,382
    Usual Care: US $0

    Average total cost over 36 weeks (therapy + all other healthcare utilization)


    Robot Therapy: US $17,831 (other healthcare $12,679)
    ICT: US $19,746 (other healthcare $12,364)
    Usual Care: US $19,098 (other healthcare $19,098)


    Study published in the American Heart Association
    “An Economic Analysis of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Long-Term Upper-Limb Impairment After Stroke”

    Background and Purpose —”Stroke is a leading cause of disability. Rehabilitation robotics have been developed to aid in recovery after a stroke. This study determined the additional cost of robot-assisted therapy and tested its cost-effectiveness”.

    Conclusion:  ”The added cost of delivering robot or intensive comparison therapy was recuperated by lower healthcare use costs compared with those in the usual care group”

    Discussion: ”The use of robotic technology for stroke rehabilitation is a rapidly growing area. The VA ROBOTICS study demonstrated modest clinical benefit for robot-assisted therapy compared with usual care at 36 weeks.

    Although providing additional care using new technology can be expensive, the total costs, which include therapy and healthcare costs, were not greater for the robot group than the usual care group. Patients in the robot and intensive comparison groups had lower average costs than patients in usual care group.

    From a healthcare system perspective, this suggests an offset in the system, which will require studies with larger samples to fully understand.”

    Todd H. Wagner, Albert C. Lo, Peter Peduzzi, Dawn M. Bravata, Grant D. Huang, Hermano I. Krebs, Robert J. Ringer, Daniel G Federman, Lorie G. Richards, Jodie K. Haselkorn, George F. Wittenberg, Bruce T. Volpe, Christopher T Bever, Pamela W. Duncan, Andrew Siroka and Peter D. Guarino
    Stroke published online July 14, 2011
    Stroke is published by the American Heart Association. 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 72514
    @2011 American Heart Association. All rights reserved. Print ISSN:0039-2499. Online
    • Objective Outcome Measures
    • Clinical Guidelines — American Heart Association
    • Clinical Guidelines — Veterans Affairs
      • Cost Analysis—Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
    • Clinical Application Case — InMotion WRIST™
    • 2D vs 3D Therapy

    Interactive Motion Technologies — 80 Coolidge Hill Road Watertown, MA 02472 USA
    Telephone: 617 926.4800    Fax: 617 296-4808
    © 2012   Interactive Motion Technologies
    • Home
    • About Us
    • Clinical Solutions
    • Clinical Research
    • Clinicians
    • Patients
    • Press
    • Contact Us